Where to Go?
Where to Go?
This concluding chapter discusses two arguments that make the case that empirical relevance of behavioral biases cannot be used to justify an extension of government control over private lives. One general argument against paternalistic policies is that even though people have behavioral problems, they are mature enough to solve them on their own. This argument has two faces. One version is that current incarnations can control the behavior of future ones, specifically by using appropriate contracts that commit those incarnations. Another version is the so-called Coasian view, that incarnations that coexist within the same individual may achieve an efficient outcome by bargaining between themselves. Meanwhile, another class of arguments builds on the political economy critique. It states that while paternalism may help solve behavioral biases on paper, it ignores the actual working of governments.
Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.