Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Tyranny of UtilityBehavioral Social Science and the Rise of Paternalism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gilles Saint-Paul

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780691128177

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691128177.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 11 December 2017

Post-Utilitarianism: Searching for a Collective Soul in the Behavioral Era

Post-Utilitarianism: Searching for a Collective Soul in the Behavioral Era

Chapter:
(p.65) 6 Post-Utilitarianism: Searching for a Collective Soul in the Behavioral Era
Source:
The Tyranny of Utility
Author(s):

Gilles Saint-Paul

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691128177.003.0007

This chapter presents the post-utilitarian paradigm, which is defined as the attempt to reconstruct social preferences when individuals have behavioral issues. It highlights four possibilities, each of which is a potential solution to the problem of defining an objective for public policy in a world without well-defined preferences. First, one may want to reinterpret behavioral biases so as to make them compatible with the standard framework by interpreting them as rational phenomena or as a subjective form of an externality. A second approach considers each individual as made up of multiple selves and then simply aggregates the utility of all incarnations in society. A third possibility is to give up on aggregating utility and consider as legitimate only policies that improve the welfare of all incarnations, that is, Pareto-improving policies. Finally, a fourth possibility is to redefine the social welfare function as the total flow of happiness in society, irrespective of any notion of individual choice.

Keywords:   post-utilitarian paradigm, social preferences, behavioral issues, public policy, behavioral biases, rational phenomena, externality, incarnations, utility, Pareto improvements

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.