This concluding chapter considers the larger implications of the Humean account of politics generally and authority in particular, and explores the consequences for political theory of a set of Humean theses that cross the boundary between political theory and political science. It continues the suggestion that Humean liberalism may be superior to the Kantian kind. It is empirically superior at describing how human beings actually act, but also morally superior in attempting to further all human endeavors and projects, as opposed to arbitrarily elevating one—the desire for dignity or recognition—above all others. The chapter also shows how Hume's conventional approach to virtue and authority has the crucial advantage of letting political theory and ethics change as political possibilities change.
Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.