Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A Behavioral Theory of Elections$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jonathan Bendor, Daniel Diermeier, David A. Siegel, and Michael M. Ting

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780691135076

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691135076.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 13 December 2017

Voter Choice

Voter Choice

Chapter:
(p.109) Chapter Five Voter Choice
Source:
A Behavioral Theory of Elections
Author(s):

Jonathan Bendor

Daniel Diermeier

David A. Siegel

Michael M. Ting

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691135076.003.0005

This chapter considers the voter’s choice between candidates. In the context of voter choice, aspirations are internal evaluation thresholds which code an incumbent’s performance as good or bad, satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Good performance is rewarded with increased support, and bad with less support. This chapter introduces a behavioral model of voter choice that allows voters to use the identity of the incumbent’s party in their decision making. It first presents the model, along with a few definitions necessary to structure later results, before discussing the difference between naïve and sophisticated retrospective voting. Using the model, it examines aggregate electoral outcomes in large populations of voters all responding independently to an incumbent. Using simple retrospective voting rules, citizens can generate endogenous party affiliations. This creates ideological polarization when aggregated over the entire population.

Keywords:   candidates, voter choice, aspirations, voters, incumbent, retrospective voting, party affiliation, decision making

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.