Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Julia Koricheva, Jessica Gurevitch, and Kerrie Mengersen

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780691137285

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691137285.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Contributions of Meta-analysis to Conservation and Management

Contributions of Meta-analysis to Conservation and Management

Chapter:
(p.420) 26 Contributions of Meta-analysis to Conservation and Management
Source:
Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution
Author(s):

Isabelle M. Côté

Gavin B. Stewart

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691137285.003.0026

This chapter looks back through the relatively short history of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of conservation interest and highlights four areas to which these methods have contributed significantly. These include challenging conventional wisdom, measuring effectiveness of management interventions, replacing large-scale monitoring with small-scale surveys, and identifying gaps in knowledge. The chapter shows that meta-analyses and systematic reviews have contributed to answering a number of important applied questions. However, although these answers often have clear implications for conservation policy and legislation, they currently remain the focus of primarily academic interest. Given a little more time, evidence bases that are collated using systematic reviews, particularly in association with meta-analysis, are expected to increasingly influence decision making in the environmental sector, just as they have in medical fields.

Keywords:   meta-analysis, systematic reviews, conservation, conventional wisdom, management intervention, small-scale surveys, large-scale monitoring, knowledge gaps

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.