Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Playing at AcquisitionsBehavioral Option Games$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Han Smit and Thras Moraitis

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780691140001

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691140001.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 14 December 2017

How to De-Bias Valuation Over the Cycle

How to De-Bias Valuation Over the Cycle

Chapter:
(p.19) Chapter 2 How to De-Bias Valuation Over the Cycle
Source:
Playing at Acquisitions
Author(s):

Han Smit

Thras Moraitis

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691140001.003.0002

It is puzzling to note that while companies seem to rush into acquisitions during global economic booms—even when they are aware of the dangers of overpaying—they appear to lose all interest in dealing when the global economy is sluggish and the market invariably offers bargains. Deal framing in executives' analyses—the way they perceive and model their acquisition or divestment opportunities—can cause them to overestimate acquisition opportunities in hot deal markets, while their dismay in cold markets often induces them to frame deals as representing too high risk, so they hold back from making viable new acquisitions or delay divesting loss-making divisions. Decision biases can play surprisingly strong roles in the valuation analyses of even experienced executives. This chapter focuses on this particular problem: how rational analyses can become infected and lead executives to manipulate their analyses to get the answers they expect or require. It proposes a remedy that goes beyond currently applied valuation models.

Keywords:   deal framing, acquisitions, investments, valuation analysis, decision bias, rational analyses, deal markets

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.