Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Improving Public Opinion SurveysInterdisciplinary Innovation and the American National Election Studies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John H. Aldrich and Kathleen M. McGraw

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780691151458

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691151458.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 16 July 2018

Measuring Ambivalence about Government

Measuring Ambivalence about Government

Chapter:
(p.238) Chapter 14 Measuring Ambivalence about Government
Source:
Improving Public Opinion Surveys
Author(s):

Michael D. Martinez

Jason Gainous

Stephen C. Craig

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691151458.003.0014

This chapter examines ambivalence about government. The 2006 Pilot Study had included a subjective, self-report measure as well as questions designed to tap into the specific considerations that can be used to create objective, or “operative,” measures of ambivalence. While the subjective (or meta-attitudinal) ambivalence measure generally performed better than the operative measures on many of the construct-validity tests, it also was most susceptible to order effects. This chapter focuses on individuals in comparing the construct validity of objective and subjective measures of ambivalence toward government that were included in the 2006 ANES Pilot Study. It concludes that subjective and operative measures of ambivalence tap into different constdisructs.

Keywords:   government, ambivalence measures, subjective ambivalence, objective ambivalence, construct validity

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.