Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Watchdogs on the HillThe Decline of Congressional Oversight of U.S. Foreign Relations$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Linda L. Fowler

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780691151618

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691151618.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 July 2018

Committee Goals and Oversight Strategies

Committee Goals and Oversight Strategies

Chapter:
(p.98) Chapter 4 Committee Goals and Oversight Strategies
Source:
Watchdogs on the Hill
Author(s):

Linda L. Fowler

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691151618.003.0005

This chapter examines how the distinctive goals of the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations committees led to strategic choices about how much attention to devote to oversight of national security, particularly in comparison to budget activity. It explains why divided government was not a consistent motivator for national security oversight and how indicators of long-term committee goals influenced both committees' stance toward the executive branch. It argues that the Armed Services Committee muted partisan conflict and deemphasized oversight in order to attend to funding the Defense Department, whereas the Foreign Relations Committee was a more active overseer of foreign affairs during periods of divided government. The differences between the two committees reveal how selection biases built into the committee assignment process affected the rule of law in national security and shed light on the inconsistent findings in the scholarly literature with respect to divided government.

Keywords:   divided government, Senate Armed Services Committee, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, national security oversight, executive branch, Defense Department, foreign affairs, rule of law, Senate

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.