Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Watchdogs on the HillThe Decline of Congressional Oversight of U.S. Foreign Relations$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Linda L. Fowler

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780691151618

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691151618.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 July 2018

Return to the Rule of Law in International Affairs

Return to the Rule of Law in International Affairs

Chapter:
(p.171) Chapter 6 Return to the Rule of Law in International Affairs
Source:
Watchdogs on the Hill
Author(s):

Linda L. Fowler

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691151618.003.0007

This chapter examines normative political issues regarding the importance of legislative oversight in fostering the rule of law and public deliberation about foreign policy. Some observers of U.S. foreign policy argue that lawmakers ask too many questions and damage the nation's interests abroad with untimely inquiries. The performance of the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations committees thus raises broader issues about whether public accountability in international affairs is desirable or even possible in the twenty-first century. The chapter first provides an overview of the paradox of public opinion and oversight of national security before suggesting that a major barrier to a more constructive role for lawmakers in international affairs is not the Constitution, but the large number serving today who have very limited legislative experience. It also discusses the risks to the presidency that result from asserting executive supremacy over national security.

Keywords:   rule of law, foreign policy, Senate Armed Services Committee, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, international affairs, public opinion, national security oversight, U.S. Constitution, presidency, national security oversight

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.