Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
BoilerplateThe Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, and the Rule of Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Margaret Jane Radin

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780691155333

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691155333.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 April 2018

Can Autonomy Theory (Agreement, Consent) Justify Boilerplate Deletion of Rights?

Can Autonomy Theory (Agreement, Consent) Justify Boilerplate Deletion of Rights?

Chapter:
(p.82) Chapter Five Can Autonomy Theory (Agreement, Consent) Justify Boilerplate Deletion of Rights?
Source:
Boilerplate
Author(s):

Margaret Jane Radin

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691155333.003.0005

This chapter examines whether autonomy theory (agreement, consent) can justify boilerplate rights deletion schemes. It first considers strategies for assimilating World B to consent by focusing on the devolution of voluntary agreement. It then explains the difference between agreement and the notions of consent or assent before discussing the doctrine of “reasonable expectations” in insurance contracts as opposed to the notion of radical unexpectedness. It also looks at the objective theory of contract, arguing that it is not applicable to boilerplate. Furthermore, “browsewrap” and “rolling contracts” cannot be assumed to yield obligation by invoking the objective theory of contract because of the possibility of sheer ignorance. The chapter concludes by analyzing whether a firm is justified in its assertion that by clicking “I agree” the recipient actually is consenting to be bound to its terms.

Keywords:   autonomy theory, boilerplate rights, consent, voluntary agreement, agreement, assent, reasonable expectations, radical unexpectedness, contract, boilerplate

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.