Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Speech MattersOn Lying, Morality, and the Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Seana Valentine Shiffrin

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780691157023

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691157023.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 July 2018

Lying and Freedom of Speech

Lying and Freedom of Speech

Chapter:
(p.116) Chapter Four Lying and Freedom of Speech
Source:
Speech Matters
Author(s):

Seana Valentine Shiffrin

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691157023.003.0005

This chapter examines whether a strong commitment to freedom of speech precludes regulation of lies. The strong condemnation of lies and the derivation of freedom of speech from similar argumentative foundations raise questions about the legal regulation of lies. Many commentators, as well as a majority of the Justices of the Supreme Court, insist that freedom of speech may pose a general and fundamental obstacle to the legal regulation of lies as such. The chapter rejects this position, arguing that legal regulation of lying poses no intrinsic threat to freedom of speech. It considers deliberately advanced misrepresentations of the speakers' beliefs, focusing on the Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Alvarez which invalidated the Stolen Valor Act. It also discusses issues relating to content-discrimination, compelled disclosure, self-definition and identity, sincerity and personal integrity, and how lying causes particularized harm to victims.

Keywords:   freedom of speech, lying, misrepresentation, United States v. Alvarez, Stolen Valor Act, content-discrimination, compelled disclosure, self-definition, sincerity, harm

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.