Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
War PowersThe Politics of Constitutional Authority$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mariah Zeisberg

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780691157221

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691157221.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 July 2018

“Uniting Our Voice at the Water’s Edge”

“Uniting Our Voice at the Water’s Edge”

Legislative Authority in the Cold War and Roosevelt Corollary

Chapter:
(p.92) Chapter 3 “Uniting Our Voice at the Water’s Edge”
Source:
War Powers
Author(s):

Mariah Zeisberg

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691157221.003.0003

This chapter uses the relational conception to argue against the quality of the legislature's constitutional construction in the era of the Roosevelt Corollary. Applying the processual standards, it argues that the early Cold War security order was more, not less, constitutionally authoritative than that of the Roosevelt Corollary because its Congresses were able to articulate, challenge, and ultimately ratify its construction of constitutional powers. Applying the substantive standard of defensive war, it also argues that early Cold War Congresses faced a more important national threat, to which broader presidential empowerment for defensive purposes was a reasonable response. For both processual and substantive reasons, the constitutional construction of early Cold War congresses is easier to defend under the relational conception than the formally parallel, but lower quality pro-presidency construction of the congresses of the Roosevelt Corollary.

Keywords:   relational conception, Cold War, security order, Roosevelt Corollary, legislature

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.