Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Paradoxes of Liberal DemocracyIslam, Western Europe, and the Danish Cartoon Crisis$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Paul M. Sniderman, Michael Bang Petersen, Rune Slothuus, and Rune Stubager

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780691161105

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691161105.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 11 December 2017

A Clash of Rights

A Clash of Rights

Chapter:
(p.10) Chapter 2 A Clash of Rights
Source:
Paradoxes of Liberal Democracy
Author(s):

Paul M. Sniderman

Michael Bang Petersen

Rune Slothuus

Rune Stubager

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691161105.003.0002

This chapter explains why, even in the cauldron of a crisis over the claims of Islam, fear of and anger toward Islamic fundamentalists did not spill over to Muslims in Denmark. It focuses on the support for the civil rights of Danish Muslims and advances a theory of group categorization and civil rights. The theoretical premise is that it is not possible to form individualized judgments about the civil rights to which each and every group is entitled. It is not possible for ordinary citizens or, for that matter, political theorists. All of us must simplify, and we simplify by organizing groups into a small number of categories—indeed, as an empirical matter, into two categories: Muslims and Islamic fundamentalists. The chapter shows that ordinary citizens drew a clear distinction between them. The public at large—routinely derided as so ill informed about politics and incoherent in their thinking as to be unable to discharge the duties of democratic citizenship—in fact treated Muslims as they would treat groups that are controversial but undeniably legitimate.

Keywords:   Islam, Islamic fundamentalists, Danish Muslims, democratic citizenship, civil rights, group categorization

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.