Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Epistemic AngstRadical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Duncan Pritchard

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780691167237

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: October 2017

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691167237.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use (for details see http://www.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 April 2018

Epistemological Disjunctivism and the Factivity of Reasons

Epistemological Disjunctivism and the Factivity of Reasons

Chapter:
(p.123) Chapter 5 Epistemological Disjunctivism and the Factivity of Reasons
Source:
Epistemic Angst
Author(s):

Duncan Pritchard

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691167237.003.0006

This chapter demonstrates that epistemological disjunctivism represents a viable theoretical option when it comes to our understanding of perceptual knowledge. It also shows that this proposal has direct application to the underdeterminationRK-based radical skeptical paradox. In particular, epistemological disjunctivism rejects the new evil demon intuition and the insularity of reasons thesis that underlies it, and hence is in a position to deny one of the claims that makes up this paradox. Moreover, epistemological disjunctivism can also lay claim to being an undercutting anti-skeptical proposal. Finally, the chapter discusses how epistemological disjunctivism is able to trade on the general epistemological distinction that has been drawn between favoring and discriminating epistemic support.

Keywords:   epistemological disjunctivism, perceptual knowledge, radical skepticism, anti-skeptical proposal, epistemic support, underdetermination

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.