Page of

Can Utilitarian-Welfare (Economic) Theory Justify Boilerplate Deletion of Rights?

Can Utilitarian-Welfare (Economic) Theory Justify Boilerplate Deletion of Rights?

Chapter:
(p.99) Chapter Six Can Utilitarian-Welfare (Economic) Theory Justify Boilerplate Deletion of Rights?
Source:
Boilerplate
Author(s):
Margaret Jane Radin
Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691155333.003.0006

This chapter examines whether boilerplate rights deletion schemes can be justified by the “contract-as-product” theory. The contract-as-product theory attempts to sidestep the issue of consent by denying that a particular set of contracted terms is an individual transaction requiring consent in the traditional sense. According to this view, whatever adhesion terms accompany the purchase of a product should actually be conceived of as part of the product. The chapter considers how choice or consent by the recipient enters into the contract-as-product view, and how information asymmetry and heuristic biases render erroneous the assumption of economic rationality. It argues that contract-as-product theory cannot suffice to validate boilerplate in general, or even presumptively.

Keywords:   boilerplate rights, contract-as-product theory, consent, contract, choice, information asymmetry, heuristic biases, economic rationality, boilerplate

Sign In

Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy and Legal Notice