Monism or Limited Government?
Monism or Limited Government?
This chapter examines a paradox—although early Confucianism endorses the idea that authority exists to serve the people and that authority cannot be based on arbitrary will, it embraces the notion that authority must be monist and supreme and not be subject to any higher legal constraints. The chapter argues that the notion of monist and supreme authority must be given up if Confucian political thought is to have any potential today. Instead of hoping for the appearance of a godlike figure to assume a position of utmost power, Confucians should adopt a political system that brings together people with flawed but above-average levels of virtue and intelligence in positions of power, allowing them to check among themselves, and also be checked by the people.
Keywords: Confucianism, authority, monism, Confucian political thought, supreme authority, Confucians
Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.