Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A History of Ambiguity$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Anthony Ossa-Richardson

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780691167954

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: January 2020

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691167954.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in PRSO for personal use.date: 04 July 2022

Forensic Idols

Forensic Idols

Chapter:
(p.73) Chapter Two. Forensic Idols
Source:
A History of Ambiguity
Author(s):

Anthony Ossa-Richardson

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691167954.003.0002

This chapter examines the role of ambiguity in a hermeneutic setting that sees it only as doubt and never as plenty, namely, the English common law, where discussions about the nature of ambiguity serve as a proxy for a deeper controversy about what it means to interpret a text—a will, a contract, or a statute. Of the three hermeneutic disciplines—literature, law, and theology—it seems best to begin with the law for three reasons. First, its setting is closely bound to the rhetorical discourses discussed in the previous chapter. Second, legal hermeneutics stands somewhat apart from scripture and literary exegesis in that it never countenances the legitimacy of deliberate ambiguity. Third, of the three subjects, law is the most essential to society. If it was important to determine the sense of a line in Horace or St. John, it was far more so in a contract, for at stake there was not merely a grasp of the classics or the soul's eternal salvation, but money. Indeed, the machine of legal practice, of arguing and deciding cases, has always held to a rhythm of finding and resolving ambiguities. Rather than trying to cover all bases in the history of legal ambiguity, the chapter approaches the topic through its connection to the more fundamental hermeneutic problem of intention.

Keywords:   ambiguity, doubt, English common law, interpretation, legal hermeneutics, deliberate ambiguity, legal practice, legal ambiguity, intention

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.