Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Dilemmas of InclusionMuslims in European Politics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Rafaela M. Dancygier

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780691172590

Published to Princeton Scholarship Online: May 2018

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691172590.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM PRINCETON SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.princeton.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Princeton University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in PRSO for personal use.date: 25 September 2021

Ideology, Electoral Incentives, and Inclusion Outcomes across Countries

Ideology, Electoral Incentives, and Inclusion Outcomes across Countries

Chapter:
(p.77) 4 Ideology, Electoral Incentives, and Inclusion Outcomes across Countries
Source:
Dilemmas of Inclusion
Author(s):

Rafaela M. Dancygier

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691172590.003.0004

This chapter investigates whether two countervailing forces—ideological commitments to equal treatment and the potential electoral leverage of the Muslim vote—can nevertheless lead to representational parity. It examines how parties' commitments to equal treatment and nondiscrimination on the one hand and the potential importance of the Muslim vote on the other correlate with inclusion outcomes across countries. Across the cities and parties in Austria, Belgium, Germany, and Great Britain, the Left is indeed much more tightly wedded to principles of equal treatment than is the Right, but proactive rhetoric in this domain does not predict inclusiveness. Though, within countries, center-left parties are always more likely to recruit Muslim candidates than are center-right parties, this is not true across countries; parties only feature significant shares of Muslim candidates when local Muslim electorates can deliver substantial votes.

Keywords:   ideological commitments, electoral incentives, Muslim vote, representational parity, equal treatment, inclusion, Muslim electorates, nondiscrimination

Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.