Knowledge or Conjecture
Knowledge or Conjecture
This chapter shows how Ptolemy blends an Aristotelian form of empiricism with a Platonic concern for distinguishing knowledge and opinion, and thereby produces a new and subversive epistemology where mathematics is the only science that generates knowledge rather than conjecture. He argues that philosophers will never reach consensus on the nature of physical and theological objects, because these fields of inquiry are, on their own, conjectural. Mathematics, on the other hand, yields sure and incontrovertible knowledge, and its contributions to physics and theology are epistemically efficacious. Mathematics enables a good guess at the nature of the Prime Mover, and it reveals the nature of physical objects. In this way, Ptolemy bolsters the value of mathematics and co-opts the fields of inquiry traditionally studied by philosophers for mathematicians.
Keywords: Claudius Ptolemy, Aristotelian philosophy, empiricism, epistemology, mathematics
Princeton Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
